From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 11, 2008
992 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 2008)

Opinion

No. SC08-1012.

September 11, 2008.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 2D08-1962, 91-7644.


Because Petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the reinstatement of Norris v. State, Case No. 2D08-1962, in the Second District Court of Appeal, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Norris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 11, 2008
992 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 2008)
Case details for

Norris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shelby Eugene Norris, Petitioner(s) v. State Of Florida, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 11, 2008

Citations

992 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 2008)