From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norrell v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 27, 1963
155 So. 2d 338 (Ala. 1963)

Opinion

4 Div. 152.

June 27, 1963.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dale County, Mike Sollie, III, J.

John C. Walters, Troy, for appellant.

Chas. L. Woods and Chas. O. Stokes, Ozark, for appellee.


On October 19, 1962, appellant filed in the circuit court of Dale County a petition for mandamus to require appellee, the Judge of Probate of said county, to make certain changes in the names of candidates for county commissioner from district No. 3 on ballots to be used in the general election to be held on November 6, 1962. The trial court issued a rule nisi on October 19, and set "a hearing on the rule nisi" for October 25. An oral hearing was had on the date set and on October 26 a judgment was rendered denying the petition for mandamus. On October 29, petitioner took this appeal from that judgment. The case was submitted here on March 29, 1963.

It seems clear that the case is moot. Accordingly, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal. It has been held that if an event, pending appeal, makes determination of the appeal unnecessary, or renders it clearly impossible for the appellate court to grant effectual relief, the appeal will be dismissed. State ex rel. City of Prichard v. Jansen, 271 Ala. 104, 106, 122 So.2d 736; McDonald v. Lyle, 270 Ala. 715, 717, 121 So.2d 885; State ex rel. Lloyd v. Morris, 262 Ala. 432, 433, 79 So.2d 431; Shelton v. Shelton, 248 Ala. 48, 49, 26 So.2d 553.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Norrell v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 27, 1963
155 So. 2d 338 (Ala. 1963)
Case details for

Norrell v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:W. E. NORRELL, Jr. v. Kirke (S. K.) ADAMS, Judge of Probate

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 27, 1963

Citations

155 So. 2d 338 (Ala. 1963)
155 So. 2d 338

Citing Cases

Hill v. Wilkinson

We agree with the parties that the case is moot. Both appellant and appellee cited the same cases which hold…

City of Pike Rd. v. City of Montgomery

First, it is evident that Pike Road does not actually want this Court to hold that this appeal is moot…