From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norman v. Animal Emergency Clinic

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct 25, 2011
351 S.W.3d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED 95883.

2011-10-25

Marvin J. NORMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC, Defendant/Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, William C. Seay, Judge. Stephen A. Walsh, Law Offices of Stephen A. Walsh, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Katherine J. Hausman, Law Offices of Rouse and Cary, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, William C. Seay, Judge. Stephen A. Walsh, Law Offices of Stephen A. Walsh, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Katherine J. Hausman, Law Offices of Rouse and Cary, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action to recover damages from injuries suffered when he was bitten by his dog while it was being examined by a veterinarian. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Norman v. Animal Emergency Clinic

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct 25, 2011
351 S.W.3d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Norman v. Animal Emergency Clinic

Case Details

Full title:Marvin J. NORMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

351 S.W.3d 249 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)