From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Communications Workers of America

United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Jul 18, 1991
137 F.R.D. 213 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

         Plaintiff brought action for unfair discharge and termination of disability benefits. Plaintiff sought a default judgment. The District Court, Owen, J., held that: (1) the technical oversight in failing to file a copy of the answer with the district court shortly after the plaintiff had been served with the answer did not warrant a default judgment more than two years later, and (2) the motion for a default was so patently frivolous to warrant awarding the defendant $250 for its expenses.

         Motion for default denied and sanctions granted.

          Noah Kinigstein, New York City, for plaintiff.

          Ronald G. Burden, Saul Scheier, New York City, for defendants New York Telephone Co., et. al.


         MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

          OWEN, District Judge:

          Plaintiff, alleging unfair discharge and termination of disability benefits, seeks a default judgment against defendant New York Telephone Company (Telco) on the ground that Telco failed to " answer" the amended complaint. On April 4, 1989 Telco timely served its answer to the amended complaint upon the attorneys for plaintiff and co-defendant CWA. Plaintiff does not contest that he was properly served with Telco's answer, but rather claims that Telco did not file a copy of its answer with the court shortly thereafter. Plaintiff has proceeded through two years of discovery, Court appearances, motion practice, and preparation for trial without questioning Telco's answer. Indeed, plaintiff only moved for this default when, shortly before the scheduled trial date, plaintiff's counsel looked through the Court files and discovered that Telco had neglected to file its answer. Telco thereupon filed its answer and cured this technical oversight. Under these circumstances, it is inconceivable that any attorney could, in good faith, believe that a Court would enter default judgment against a defendant. Plaintiff's motion is denied and because plaintiff's motion is so patently frivolous I award to defendant its expenses of opposing this motion in the amount of $250.00, to be paid within 30 days or proceedings are thereafter stayed until this is done.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Communications Workers of America

United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Jul 18, 1991
137 F.R.D. 213 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

Communications Workers of America

Case Details

Full title:Norman DeJESUS, Plaintiff, v. COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Date published: Jul 18, 1991

Citations

137 F.R.D. 213 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)