Norem v. Norem

5 Citing cases

  1. Parker v. Exeter Fin. Corp.

    Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-4007-D (N.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2015)

    "Under Texas law, a contract may establish an attorney's lien for money received in judgment or settlement of a matter." Norem v. Norem, 2008 WL 2245821, at *6 (N.D. Tex. June 2, 2008) (Stickney, J.) (quoting United States v. Betancourt, 2005 WL 3348908, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 8, 2005)). The managing partner of Lemberg Law has offered uncontested evidence that supports the firm's assertion of a contractual attorney's lien.

  2. U.S. v. Perez

    CIVIL ACTION NO. L-08-109 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2010)

    "While state law determines whether the taxpayer has any rights to the property in question, federal law determines whether a federal tax lien will attach to that property or right." Norem v. Norem, No. 3:07-CV-0051-BF(G), 2008 WL 2245821, at *3 (N.D. Tex. June 2, 2008) (citing United States v. Bess, 357 U.S. 51, 57 (1958)). Section 6321 of the Internal Revenue Code provides as follows:

  3. Barbknecht Firm, P.C. v. Keese (In re Keese)

    Case No. 18-40817 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2021)   Cited 1 times

    49. "Under Texas law, a contract may establish an attorney's lien for money received in judgment or settlement of a matter." Norem v. Norem, 2008 WL 2245821, at *5-6 (N.D. Tex. June 2, 2008) (citing Betancourt II, 2005 WL 3348908, at *3 and Thomson, 205 S.W. at 832). 50. An attorney's acquisition of a charging lien through an express contract is not forbidden by the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.

  4. Rotella v. Cutting

    NO. 02-10-00028-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    However, absent such a contract, no lien exists. Norem v. Norem, No. 3:07-CV-0051-BF(G), 2008 WL 2245821, at *5-6 (N.D. Tex. June 2, 2008) (citations omitted). The record reflects that Cole never possessed the interpleaded funds; therefore, he did not have a possessory lien.

  5. Rotella v. Cutting

    No. 02-10-00028-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2011)

    However, absent such a contract, no lien exists.Norem v. Norem, No. 3:07-CV-0051-BF(G), 2008 WL 2245821, at *5-6 (N.D. Tex. June 2, 2008) (citations omitted). The record reflects that Cole never possessed the interpleaded funds; therefore, he did not have a possessory lien.