Opinion
Case No. CV 09-08441 DDP (VBKx)
10-27-2011
NOMADIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; WAYPORT, INC., a Delaware corporation; IBAHN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LTD., a Canadian corporation; GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; a California corporation; LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; LODGENET STAYONLINE, INC., a Delaware corporation; ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.; a Delaware corporation; SUPERCLICK, INC., A Washington corporation; SUPERCLICK NETWORKS, INC., a Canadian corporation, Defendants.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
[Docket No. 472]
Presently before the court is Defendant Hewlett Packard Company's Motion for Reconsideration of Claim Construction. There is no need to reach Plaintiff Nomadix, Inc.'s contention that Defendant's Motion is procedurally improper under Local Rule 7-18. The court concludes that its August 31, 2011 Claim Construction Order was correct on the merits. The court therefore DENIES Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge