From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noirmot v. Rosemary

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 23, 1925
9 F.2d 982 (4th Cir. 1925)

Opinion

No. 2436.

November 23, 1925.

Cross-Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Edmund Waddill, Judge.

For opinion in court below, see 9 F.2d 980.

Jacob Louis Morewitz, of Newport News, Va., for appellants and cross-appellees.

John V. Groner, of Norfolk, Va. (Groner Gary, of Norfolk, Va., S.L. Sinnott, of Richmond, Va., and Barham R. Gary, of Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellees and cross-appellants.

Before ROSE and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.


We have considered the testimony and the oral and printed arguments. We are satisfied that the amount awarded by the decree below to the libelant Noirmot is ample to cover all claims he has against the respondents or either of them. We are not prepared to say it is excessive. We believe that the learned court below was right in holding that the other libelants had failed to establish any ground for recovery.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Noirmot v. Rosemary

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 23, 1925
9 F.2d 982 (4th Cir. 1925)
Case details for

Noirmot v. Rosemary

Case Details

Full title:William NOIRMOT, J. Olsen, Peder Hansen, J. Windehl and M. Derrane…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 23, 1925

Citations

9 F.2d 982 (4th Cir. 1925)