From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noel v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Feb 13, 2012
Case No. 3:99-CV-649-AC (D. Or. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:99-CV-649-AC

02-13-2012

ERIC NOEL, Plaintiff, v. MYRNA A. HALL, trustee and personal representative of the ESTATE OF BRIAN C. HALL, deceased, SANDRA A. HALL, fka SANDRA JOHNSON, GABRIELLE S. LENNARTZ, HERB WEISSER, and MICHELLE A. MERCHANT, Defendants.


ORDER

HAGGERTY, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Acosta has issued a Findings and Recommendation [463] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying plaintiff's motion to reinstate six wiretap and related claims against defendant Sandra Hall. No objections were filed by either party, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. Accordingly, this court adopts the Findings and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate [454] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Ancer L. Haggerty

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Noel v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Feb 13, 2012
Case No. 3:99-CV-649-AC (D. Or. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Noel v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:ERIC NOEL, Plaintiff, v. MYRNA A. HALL, trustee and personal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:99-CV-649-AC (D. Or. Feb. 13, 2012)