From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noble v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Mar 16, 2015
No. 05-15-00269-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-15-00269-CR

03-16-2015

REGINALD A. NOBLE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. W00-50025-K

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown
Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Reginald Noble was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to life in prison. Appellant's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Noble v. State, No. 08-01-00035-CR, 2002 WL 221886 (Tex. App—El Paso Feb. 4, 2002, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication). The Court now has before it appellant's "Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal," which we will treat as a pro se notice of appeal. In the document, appellant appears to complain about a post-conviction habeas corpus order of the trial court rendered under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure.

The appeal, originally filed in this Court and docketed as cause no. 05-00-02050-CR, was transferred to the El Paso Court of Appeals under a docket equalization order of the Texas Supreme Court.

On October 21, 2014, the trial court issued an order finding that "there are no controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of the Applicant's confinement which require an evidentiary hearing" and recommending to the court of criminal appeals that appellant's tenth application for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. To the extent that appellant seeks to appeal the ruling on the post-conviction habeas corpus petition, this Court has no jurisdiction over such proceedings. See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. arts. 11.05, 11.07 (West 2005 & Supp. 2014) (identifying courts that may grant post-conviction writs of habeas corpus and procedure for post-conviction habeas corpus applications). To the extent appellant seeks to challenge by direct appeal the sentence imposed in 2000, his March 9, 2015 notice of appeal is untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (notice of appeal due within thirty days after sentence suspended or imposed in open court).

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
150269F.U05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. W00-50025-K.
Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Noble v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Mar 16, 2015
No. 05-15-00269-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Noble v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD A. NOBLE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Mar 16, 2015

Citations

No. 05-15-00269-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2015)