From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noble J. Dick, Inc. v. Warburton

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 4, 1975
334 A.2d 225 (Del. 1975)

Opinion

Argued February 18, 1975.

Decided March 4, 1975.

David Snellenburg, II, Wilmington, for appellant.

William F. Taylor and Jack B. Jacobs, Young, Conaway, Stargatt Taylor, Wilmington, for Phoenix Steel Corp., appellee.

James T. McKinstry, Richards, Layton Finger, Wilmington, for E.W. Bliss Co., appellee.

Before DUFFY and McNEILLY, JJ., and WALSH, Judge.


This appeal brings up for review an order of the Superior Court, entered on cross-motions for summary judgment. The effect of the order is to validate an indemnification agreement and defer until trial the legal significance of a release.

We approve the analysis by the Superior Court of the indemnity agreement. 321 A.2d 345 (1973). The agreement clearly and unequivocally requires the contractor to indemnify the owner and the prime contractor against any liability for their own negligence, respectively. In brief, the agreement meets the tests stated in All-State Inv. and Sec. Agcy., Inc. v. Turner Const. Co., Del.Supr., 301 A.2d 273 (1972), and State v. Interstate Amiesite Corp., Del.Supr., 297 A.2d 41 (1972).

The Court deferred a ruling on the legal significance of the release given by the contractor to the prime contractor until after trial. We cannot say as a matter of law it was error to do so.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Noble J. Dick, Inc. v. Warburton

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 4, 1975
334 A.2d 225 (Del. 1975)
Case details for

Noble J. Dick, Inc. v. Warburton

Case Details

Full title:NOBLE J. DICK, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant Below…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 4, 1975

Citations

334 A.2d 225 (Del. 1975)

Citing Cases

Sweetman v. Strescon Industries, Inc.

State v. Interstate Amiesite Corporation, Del.Supr., 297 A.2d 41 (1972); Powell v. Interstate Vendaway, Inc.,…

J.A. Jones Const. Co. v. City of Dover

The Delaware cases which have found contractual language sufficient to protect a party against a claim based…