From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

No Barriers, Inc. v. BRH Texas GP, L.L.C.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 2, 2001
Civil Action No. 3:01-CV-0344-R (N.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2001)

Summary

finding that the leasing office within an apartment complex constituted a "retail establishment" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12181(E), while the rest of the building was exempt from ADA requirements

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Fairfield Props.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:01-CV-0344-R.

August 2, 2001.


ORDER


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case and the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge on the Defendants' 12(b) Motion to Dismiss, filed May 18, 2001, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Defendants' 12(b) Motion to Dismiss, filed May 18, 2001, is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

No Barriers, Inc. v. BRH Texas GP, L.L.C.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 2, 2001
Civil Action No. 3:01-CV-0344-R (N.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2001)

finding that the leasing office within an apartment complex constituted a "retail establishment" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12181(E), while the rest of the building was exempt from ADA requirements

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Fairfield Props.

In No Barriers, the plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, owners of an apartment building, had violated the ADA by failing to provide wheelchair-accessible routes to the leasing office in the building.

Summary of this case from Sapp v. MHI Partnership, Ltd.
Case details for

No Barriers, Inc. v. BRH Texas GP, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:NO BARRIERS, INC., and WILLIAM BROWN Plaintiffs, v. BRH TEXAS GP, L.L.C.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2001

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:01-CV-0344-R (N.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2001)

Citing Cases

Willis v. Villa Piana Corp.

Although the terms under the ADA “should be construed liberally” to afford people with disabilities “equal…

Sapp v. MHI Partnership, Ltd.

Another Court within this District came to that very conclusion after being confronted with the issue of…