From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wate, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 5, 1962
310 F.2d 700 (6th Cir. 1962)

Opinion

No. 14797.

December 5, 1962.

Glen M. Bendixsen, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.

William P. Hutcheson, Chattanooga, Tenn., Humphreys, Banks Hutcheson, Chattanooga, Tenn., on brief, for respondent.

Before McALLISTER and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and LEVIN, District Judge.


PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

The above cause coming on to be heard on petition for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board, and it appearing that substantial evidence on the record as a whole, supports the Board's findings that respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act by first refusing to bargain in good faith with the Union, and by later refusing to execute a contract, although the agreement had been reached on all of its terms.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order be granted.


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wate, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 5, 1962
310 F.2d 700 (6th Cir. 1962)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wate, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. WATE, INC., Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 5, 1962

Citations

310 F.2d 700 (6th Cir. 1962)

Citing Cases

N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Car Truck Leasing, Inc.

Based on the foregoing facts, we can only conclude there was substantial evidence in the record to support…

N.L.R.B. v. Huttig Sash and Door Company

29 U.S.C.A. § 158(d). See, e.g., Lozano Enterprises v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1964); Standard Oil Co.…