From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 29, 1982
705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1693.

October 29, 1982.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent.

Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone Apparel Corp., 255 NLRB No. 101 (1981), and for an order awarding punitive damages and double costs against the respondent company.

The Court has considered the motion and the briefs of the Board and the intervenor. It is noted that the respondent has not filed a brief on the merits nor has it responded to the instant motion. Finding the motion for enforcement of the Board's order to be well taken,

It is ORDERED that the motion be, and it hereby is, granted, and the Clerk shall enter a judgment enforcing in its entirety the order of the Board. It is further ORDERED that the intervenor union recover from the respondent double the costs of this action; Rule 38, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. That part of the motion seeking punitive damages is hereby denied.


Summaries of

N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 29, 1982
705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)
Case details for

N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER, AND INTERNATIONAL LADIES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 29, 1982

Citations

705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

N.L.R.B. v. Unbelievable, Inc.

NLRB v. Catalina Yachts, 679 F.2d 180, 182 (9th Cir. 1982) (citations omitted). A union-intervenor may…

N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Brotherhood

Id. However, if "the reasons advanced by the employer were pretextual, that determination constitutes a…