From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nixon v. Mills

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
May 26, 2010
CASE NO. 3:10CV00012 BSM-HLJ (E.D. Ark. May. 26, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10CV00012 BSM-HLJ.

May 26, 2010


ORDER


The court has received the recommended disposition from Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones and plaintiff Ronnie Nixon's response (Doc. No. 15). After carefully reviewing the recommended disposition, Nixon's response, and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects in its entirety.

Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Further, it is hereby certified that this dismissal constitutes a "strike" and that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nixon v. Mills

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
May 26, 2010
CASE NO. 3:10CV00012 BSM-HLJ (E.D. Ark. May. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Nixon v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE NIXON PLAINTIFF v. LARRY MILLS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: May 26, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10CV00012 BSM-HLJ (E.D. Ark. May. 26, 2010)

Citing Cases

Nixon v. Richardson

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Nixon v. Mills, No. 3:10-CV-12-BSM (E.D. Ark.); Nixon v. Cox, No. 3:17-CV-122-BRW…

Nixon v. Overstreet

Nixon v. Mills, et al, 3:10cv00012-BSM (E.D. Ark.); Nixon v. Cox, 3:17cv00122-BRW (E.D. Ark.); and Nixon v.…