From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nipp v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nov 26, 1963
324 F.2d 711 (10th Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 7222.

November 26, 1963.

No appearance for appellant.

Robert N. Chaffin, U.S. Atty., District of Wyoming, and Leroy V. Amen, Asst. U.S. Atty., District of Wyoming, on the brief, for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT, LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN, HILL, and SETH, Circuit Judges.


Appellant pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He seeks relief from the sentence imposed and asserts mental incompetence at the time of the guilty plea. The trial court treated his petition for coram nobis as an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denied it without a hearing.

A claim of mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea may be raised under § 2255 and, when raised, may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 710, decided today. As in Ellison we direct the attention of the trial court to the admonitions appearing in Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 495-496, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, and in Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 20-23, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the views here expressed.


Summaries of

Nipp v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nov 26, 1963
324 F.2d 711 (10th Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Nipp v. United States

Case Details

Full title:James William NIPP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Nov 26, 1963

Citations

324 F.2d 711 (10th Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

Von Pickrell v. People

Waley v. Johnston, 316 U.S. 101, 104, 62 S.Ct. 964, 966, 86 L.Ed. 1302, 1304. No matter how improbable these…

U.S. v. Barnes

A defendant who later raises the issue of mental competency at the time of entry of a plea or trial is…