From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nine Hunts Lane Realty v. N.Y. State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 5, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The subject premises consist of two adjacent buildings in Brooklyn. One of the buildings, which is located at 9 Hunts Lane, contains two dwelling units. The other building, which is located at 116 Remsen Street, contains 10 dwelling units. The two buildings have a long history of common ownership and management.

The principal issue is whether the various factors present here are sufficient to provide a rational basis for the determination by the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter the DHCR) that the common facilities, ownership, and management of the buildings warrant the treating of the premises as one integrated unit, thereby constituting a horizontal multiple dwelling for purposes of rent stabilization. Based upon a physical inspection by the DHCR's inspector, which found that the premises had shared a common heating, sewer, oil and water system, the DHCR determined that the two units constituted a single horizontal multiple dwelling and are therefore subject to the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974.

It is well settled that a determination of the DHCR which is rationally based and in accordance with the law should be upheld, even where there are divergent factors which might lead to different conclusions (see, Matter of Krakower v. State of New York, Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, Off. of Rent Admin., 137 A.D.2d 688; Matter of Love Sec. Corp. v. Berman, 38 A.D.2d 169, 171). The DHCR considered all of the relevant factors and concluded that the common features predominate (see, Matter of Bambeck v. State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, Off. of Rent Admin., 129 A.D.2d 51; cf., Matter of Salvati v. Eimicke, 72 N.Y.2d 784, revg 135 A.D.2d 424). On this record we find no reason to interfere with the determination that 9 Hunts Lane and 116 Remsen Street together comprise a horizontal multiple dwelling, subject to the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nine Hunts Lane Realty v. N.Y. State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Nine Hunts Lane Realty v. N.Y. State Division

Case Details

Full title:NINE HUNTS LANE REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 255

Citing Cases

Piazzola v. N.Y. State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

While different combinations of those factors may be present in any given case, no one factor is…

Mendoza v. N.Y. State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

Although different combinations of those factors may be present in any given case, no one factor is…