Summary
concluding that "it would be inappropriate for the Court to engage in a Lauritzen-Rhoditis analysis at this time," reasoning that "the Lauritzen-Rhoditis framework requires a fact-intensive analysis, discovery is necessary before a determination can be made as to whether this Jones Act claim should be dismissed"
Summary of this case from Unterberg v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3901.
October 28, 2010
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.