From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niewind v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 20, 2016
Civil No. 14-4744 (DWF/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 20, 2016)

Summary

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants where there was no evidence to support the plaintiff's allegations that he was threatened and disciplined for writing a threatening kite

Summary of this case from Burke v. Glass

Opinion

Civil No. 14-4744 (DWF/HB)

07-20-2016

Eric Allen Niewind, Plaintiff, v. Michelle Smith, Chris Esty, Melissa Caffes, Nanette Larson, Kenneth Eldridge, Darryl Quiram, Lon Augdahl, Terry Jorgenson, Steve Huot, Sara Hard, Diane Dau, Marina Fuhrman, Director Centurion Managed Care, and Dawn LaVasseur, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer dated May 24, 2016. (Doc. No. 75.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's May 24, 2016 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [75]) is ADOPTED.

2. Defendants Michelle Smith, Chris Esty, Melissa Caffes, Nanette Larson, Terry Jorgenson, Steve Huot, Sara Hard, Diane Dau, Dawn LaVasseur, and Marina Fuhrman's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [53]) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART, in that:

a. Plaintiff's federal law claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

b. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

c. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DENIED AS MOOT.

3. Defendants Centurion of Minnesota, Darryl Quiram, Lon Augdahl, and Kenneth Eldridge's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [66]) is GRANTED, in that:

a. Plaintiff's federal law claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

b. Plaintiff's state-law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: July 20, 2016

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Niewind v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 20, 2016
Civil No. 14-4744 (DWF/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 20, 2016)

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants where there was no evidence to support the plaintiff's allegations that he was threatened and disciplined for writing a threatening kite

Summary of this case from Burke v. Glass
Case details for

Niewind v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Eric Allen Niewind, Plaintiff, v. Michelle Smith, Chris Esty, Melissa…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 20, 2016

Citations

Civil No. 14-4744 (DWF/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Burke v. Glass

Burke has not alleged any facts and can produce no evidence to support his assertion that his confinement to…