From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nielsen v. Travelers Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 20, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that a question of fact has been raised as to whether the plaintiff-insured demanded coverage from the defendant-insurer "as soon as practicable" as is required by the insurance policy (see, Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12; Security Mut. Ins. Co. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 436; Farmers Fire Ins. Co. v Brighton, 142 A.D.2d 547; Columbus Trust Co. v. Hanover Ins. Co., 50 A.D.2d 798). However, contrary to the plaintiffs' arguments, the defendant-insurer issued a disclaimer "as soon as was reasonably possible" given, inter alia, the age of the policy at issue and its limited scope of coverage (Norfolk Dedham Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Petrizzi, 121 A.D.2d 276, 277). Lawrence, J.P., Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nielsen v. Travelers Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Nielsen v. Travelers Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:PHYLLIS NIELSEN, Respondent-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

New York State Ins. Fund v. Merchants Ins. Co.

However, a question of fact exists that prevents the grant of summary judgment to Merchants upholding its…