From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicholson v. Woodruff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 5, 2012
Civil No. 3:11-1102 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:11-1102

06-05-2012

PINDER POINTER NICHOLSON, Plaintiff, v. KRISTI WOODRUFF, MANDY HILTON, and MICHAEL GARRETT, Defendants.


Judge Trauger

Magistrate Judge Griffin


ORDER

On April 10, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 11), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state an arguable legal claim. Any appeal taken from this ruling would not be in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

It is so ORDERED.

_________________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Nicholson v. Woodruff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 5, 2012
Civil No. 3:11-1102 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Nicholson v. Woodruff

Case Details

Full title:PINDER POINTER NICHOLSON, Plaintiff, v. KRISTI WOODRUFF, MANDY HILTON, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 5, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 3:11-1102 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 5, 2012)