From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
5:12CV00152 KGB/JTR (E.D. Ark. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

5:12CV00152 KGB/JTR

10-30-2012

JOHNNY LEE NICHOLS ADC#115100 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 24). No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment (docket entry # 17) is DENIED.

2. Respondent shall file a responsive pleading within fourteen days of the entry of this Order.

_______________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nichols v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
5:12CV00152 KGB/JTR (E.D. Ark. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Nichols v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY LEE NICHOLS ADC#115100 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

5:12CV00152 KGB/JTR (E.D. Ark. Oct. 30, 2012)