From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 28, 2012
3:11-cv-00124-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00124-LRH-VPC

03-28-2012

DERRICK NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#18) entered on March 1, 2012, recommending granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#9) filed on July 1, 2011. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#18) entered on March 1, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#18) entered on March 1, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#9) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nichols v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 28, 2012
3:11-cv-00124-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Nichols v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00124-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Colvin

Moreover, "[b]are allegations of mail service delay or allegations that the government did not send the…