From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls UrBan Renewal Agency Et Al.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 14, 2008
56 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CA 07-02633.

November 14, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered September 12, 2007. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to consolidate this action with another action.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN P. BARTOLOMEI ASSOCIATES, NIAGARA FALLS (JOHN P. BARTOLOMEI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

THOMAS M. O'DONNELL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, NIAGARA FALLS (RICHARD ZUCCO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (CYNTHIA L. THOMPSON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS.

Before: Scudder, P.J., Lunn, Fahey and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Niagara Venture v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency ( 56 AD3d 1150).


Summaries of

Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls UrBan Renewal Agency Et Al.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 14, 2008
56 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls UrBan Renewal Agency Et Al.

Case Details

Full title:THE NIAGARA VENTURE, Appellant, v. NIAGARA FALLS URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 14, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8796
866 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

In re N.Y. State Urban Development Corpo

We note in any event that the contentions of NV concerning the advance payment are barred by the doctrine of…