From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nguyen v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division
Apr 19, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09cv202-DCB-JMR (S.D. Miss. Apr. 19, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09cv202-DCB-JMR.

April 19, 2011


ORDER


This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court, and the Court, having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court, and that the Respondents' Motion to Dismiss [15] should be granted and Nguyen's Petition for Writ of Mandamus [1] should be dismissed based upon this Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Rule 12(b)(6).

A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of April, 2011.


Summaries of

Nguyen v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division
Apr 19, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09cv202-DCB-JMR (S.D. Miss. Apr. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Nguyen v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Case Details

Full title:DUNG QUOC NGUYEN PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division

Date published: Apr 19, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09cv202-DCB-JMR (S.D. Miss. Apr. 19, 2011)

Citing Cases

Flores v. Hartnett

And exhausting administrative remedies requires appealing to the AAO and receiving an adverse decision. See…