From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newton v. Watkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
No. 3:12-CV-3397-N (N.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CV-3397-N

12-03-2012

RONALD EVERETT NEWTON, 1299706, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG WATKINS and RUSSELL WILSON, II, Defendants.


ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), including de novo review of the subject of Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

______________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Newton v. Watkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 3, 2012
No. 3:12-CV-3397-N (N.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Newton v. Watkins

Case Details

Full title:RONALD EVERETT NEWTON, 1299706, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG WATKINS and RUSSELL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-CV-3397-N (N.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Stookberry v. Pigg

Henry Bro. v. Wells, 48 Ark. 485." To the same effect is Newton v. Watkins, 140 Ark. 252, 215 S.W. 615. In…