Summary
writing that "the alleged 'similarities' in style and dress (e.g., jackets, coats, hats, dresses, hair styles, eyewear, and jewelry) are too common and generic, and constitute scenes-a-faire that flow directly from characters in the music industry"
Summary of this case from Tanksley v. DanielsOpinion
Case No. 15-cv-02778-CBM-JPRx
07-27-2016
RON NEWT, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Order re: Defendants Lee Daniels, Danny Strong, Terrence Howard, and Malcolm Spellman's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Prejudice and Defendant Fox Broadcasting Company's Motion For Judgment on the Pleadings, judgment is hereby entered against Plaintiff and in in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's First Cause of Action for Copyright Infringement (17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.). DATED: July 27, 2016.
/s/_________
HON. CONSUELO MARSHALL
United States District Judge