From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newsom v. Golden

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
May 9, 2022
3:22-cv-00318 (M.D. Tenn. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00318

05-09-2022

ROBERT STARBUCK NEWSOM, a/k/a ROBBY STARBUCK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT GOLDEN, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Morgan Ortagus has filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Brief in Support of Robert Starbuck Newsom's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or in the Alternative a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 31). The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Mr. Newsom has capable and competent counsel of record that includes Eric G. Osborne and Mark Alexander Carver of the law firm of Sherrard Roe Voight & Harbison. Ms. Ortagus has not identified another case that may be affected by the Court's decision in this case. Neither has she identified any “unique information or perspective” that may help the Court. Indeed, it appears at this junction that all counsel of record are competent to advance arguments on the issues presented.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Newsom v. Golden

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
May 9, 2022
3:22-cv-00318 (M.D. Tenn. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Newsom v. Golden

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT STARBUCK NEWSOM, a/k/a ROBBY STARBUCK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT GOLDEN…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00318 (M.D. Tenn. May. 9, 2022)