From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Kwan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI
Feb 24, 2012
10 Civ. 4123 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2012)

Opinion

10 Civ. 4123 (ALC) (AJP)

02-24-2012

Paul Newman, Plaintiff, v. P.A. Kwan and D. Rodriguez, Defendants.


ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:

Plaintiff Paul Newman brought this action, pro se, on May 19, 2010, and to date, has never served Defendants. On January 25, 2012, the Honorable Andrew J. Peck, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a report and recommendation concluding that the Court should dismiss this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, No party has filed objections to the R&R, but Plaintiff did file a letter on January 30, 2012 inquiring about the status of his case.

The Court reviews the R&R for clear error and finds none. If it were to apply a de novo review, the Court would find that Plaintiff never displayed good cause as to why the Court should grant an extension of time to serve and notes that Plaintiff did in fact ask for an extension over a year ago, which was granted, but still did not serve Defendants within the time allotted. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety and the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. Dated: New York, New York

February 24, 2012
SO ORDERED.

___________

Andrew L. Carter, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Newman v. Kwan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI
Feb 24, 2012
10 Civ. 4123 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Newman v. Kwan

Case Details

Full title:Paul Newman, Plaintiff, v. P.A. Kwan and D. Rodriguez, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORI

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

10 Civ. 4123 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2012)