From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Benge Flemister

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Apr 29, 1914
167 S.W. 6 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)

Opinion

No. 5343.

April 29, 1914.

Appeal from Concho County Court; James E. Houze, Judge.

Action by Benge Flemister against W. S. Newman begun in justice court. From a judgment for plaintiffs in the county court, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

George E. Critz, of Paint Rock, for appellant. Hayne P. Young and Jas. M. Simpson, both of Paint Rock, and Woodward Baker, of Coleman, for appellees.


This case originated in a justice's court, but was appealed to, and finally tried in, the county court. It is an action of debt The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendant has appealed.

Some of the objections urged by appellees to appellant's brief are well taken; but we hold that the third assignment, which complains of the action of the trial court in refusing to give a requested instruction, is presented in such a manner as to require consideration, and that error was committed in refusing to give that charge. The pleadings and the testimony presented the defense of the statute of frauds as to some of the items in the account sued on by appellees, and the court failed to charge upon that subject. The requested instruction was correctly framed, and would have supplied that omission, and it was error to refuse to give it; for which reason the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Newman v. Benge Flemister

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin
Apr 29, 1914
167 S.W. 6 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)
Case details for

Newman v. Benge Flemister

Case Details

Full title:NEWMAN v. BENGE FLEMISTER

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin

Date published: Apr 29, 1914

Citations

167 S.W. 6 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)