Newman v. Austin

Full title: Alexious G. Newman, Petitioner, v. Tyler K. Austin, Respondent.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

No. 1D20-2152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1D20-2152

06-29-2021

Alexious G. Newman, Petitioner, v. Tyler K. Austin, Respondent.

Kansas R. Gooden and Geneva R. Fountain of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Aaron Sprague, Daniel A. Iracki, Howard C. Coker, and David C. Thompson, Coker Law, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

Per Curiam

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari-Original Jurisdiction.

Kansas R. Gooden and Geneva R. Fountain of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Aaron Sprague, Daniel A. Iracki, Howard C. Coker, and David C. Thompson, Coker Law, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

Per Curiam

Dismissed. See Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So.2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998) ("[I]t is settled law that, as a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction, the petitioning party must establish that it has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal."); see also CQB 2010, LLC v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 177 So.3d 644, 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (refusing to grant certiorari review of order denying discovery because petitioner failed to show that denial would eviscerate its case).

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.