From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newbold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 4, 2002
831 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-2309.

Opinion filed December 4, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James Hankinson, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion, in which he alleged that his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum for the charged crime. The appellant alleges that he was convicted of attempted first-degree felony murder with an underlying offense of aggravated battery with a firearm. The essential elements of attempted felony murder include the elements of the actual underlying felony. Traylor v. State, 785 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 2001). Therefore, if the use of a firearm was an essential element of the appellant's aggravated battery conviction, then it was an essential element of his attempted first-degree felony murder conviction. Because the trial court did not refute this claim with record attachments, the trial court's summary denial of the appellant's motion to correct his illegal sentence is reversed and remanded for record attachments that conclusively refute his claim, or for resentencing without the enhancement.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Newbold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 4, 2002
831 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Newbold v. State

Case Details

Full title:OSWALD NEWBOLD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 4, 2002

Citations

831 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)