From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York C. Dist. Council of Carp. v. Woodcraft Ins

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2010
10 Civ. 01358 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2010)

Summary

treating default judgment motion as a summary judgment motion in a case commenced pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA")

Summary of this case from East Coast Council of Intl. All. v. You're Nob. Films

Opinion

10 Civ. 01358 (RJH).

May 11, 2010


Memorandum Opinion and Order


Plaintiffs petition the Court pursuant to Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. § 9, to confirm an arbitration award issued December 16, 2009. The complaint was filed on February 9, 2010, and defendant was served on March 2, 2010. [1; 3] On April 21, 2010, plaintiffs filed their motion for default judgment. To date, no counsel has appeared on defendant's behalf and the Court has received no opposition or other communication from defendant.

Although the plaintiff styles his current request [4] as a motion for default judgment,

default judgments in confirmation/vacatur proceedings are generally inappropriate. A motion to confirm or vacate an award is generally accompanied by a record, such as an agreement to arbitrate and the arbitration award decision itself, that may resolve many of the merits or at least command judicial deference. When a court has before it such a record, rather than only the allegations of one party found in complaints, the judgment the court enters should be based on the record.
D.H. Blair Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). Rather, the Court treats plaintiffs motion as a petition for confirmation of an arbitration award and bases this decision not only on defendant's default but on the arbitral record before it.

"[T]he confirmation of an arbitration award is a summary proceeding that merely makes what is already a final arbitration award a judgment of the court." Florasynth, Inc. v. Pickholz, 750 F.2d 171, 176 (2d Cir. 1984). Under § 9 of the FAA, upon timely application by any party, a court must grant an order to confirm an arbitration award unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in §§ 10 and 11 of the FAA. See Marsillo v. Geniton, No. 03 Civ. 2117 (TPG), 2004 WL 1207925, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 2004). Plaintiffs' petition to confirm the arbitration award [1] is hereby GRANTED. Judgment is entered for the plaintiffs in the amount of Twenty One Thousand, Seven Hundred and Twenty Five 95/100 dollars ($21,725.95) which is to be paid forthwith by Woodcraft Installers, Inc. with interest accrued at the rate of 5.25% per annum from December 16, 2009, the date of the Award.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

New York C. Dist. Council of Carp. v. Woodcraft Ins

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 11, 2010
10 Civ. 01358 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2010)

treating default judgment motion as a summary judgment motion in a case commenced pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA")

Summary of this case from East Coast Council of Intl. All. v. You're Nob. Films
Case details for

New York C. Dist. Council of Carp. v. Woodcraft Ins

Case Details

Full title:THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

10 Civ. 01358 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y. May. 11, 2010)

Citing Cases

East Coast Council of Intl. All. v. You're Nob. Films

If the non-movant does not respond, its failure to contest issues not resolved by the record will weigh…