From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New Jersey Steel and Iron Company v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1904
71 N.E. 1137 (N.Y. 1904)

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1904

Decided May 31, 1904

Henry B. Closson for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Frederick H. Man, for Paul Pfotenhauer et al., defendants, appellants.

Richard M. Martin for Albert S. Richey et al., defendants, appellants.

Philo P. Safford for Columbia Fire Proofing Company, defendant, appellant.

George B. Dunn for Masons' Supplies Company, defendant, appellant.

Wm. D. Peck for Clarence L. Smith, defendant, appellant.

Henry de Forest Baldwin and Francis Woodbridge for Charles N. Talbot, as assignee, defendant, respondent and appellant.

John M. Bowers, J. Orlando Harrison and Edgar Whitlock for Barr, Thaw Fraser et al., defendants, appellants.

John M. Bowers and William H. Van Benschoten for Francis S. Kinney, defendant, respondent.

Edward J. Patterson for Owen R. Mason, defendant, respondent.


We shall content ourselves with a brief statement of our conclusions herein, since it would be unprofitable to do more.

1. Upon the appeal of the plaintiff and the other lienors from the order of the Appellate Division reversing so much of the judgment entered upon the report of the referee as adjudged that the liens were prior and paramount to the claim of Talbot as assignee of Robinson, we reverse the order of the Appellate Division and affirm the judgment entered upon the referee's report, with the costs and allowances therein specified and with costs of this appeal payable out of the fund. ( Kane Co. v. Kinney, 174 N.Y. 69.)

2. Upon the appeal of the defendants Barr, Thaw and Fraser, and the American National Exchange Bank, from the order of the Appellate Division, reversing so much of the judgment entered upon the referee's report as adjudged the lien of Barr, Thaw and Fraser, and the claim thereunder of the American National Exchange Bank, valid as against the lien of the plaintiff, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division, with costs to the plaintiff respondent payable out of the fund. ( Bradley Currier Co. v. Pacheteau, 175 N.Y. 492.)

3. Upon the appeal of the plaintiff from the order of the Appellate Division modifying the judgment entered upon the referee's report as to the amount earned and unpaid upon Robinson's contract at the time of filing the liens herein, and as to the amount of interest payable thereon, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division, with costs to the respondent Kinney payable out of the fund.

PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, MARTIN and CULLEN, JJ., concur; HAIGHT, J., absent.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

New Jersey Steel and Iron Company v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1904
71 N.E. 1137 (N.Y. 1904)
Case details for

New Jersey Steel and Iron Company v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE NEW JERSEY STEEL AND IRON COMPANY, Appellant and Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1904

Citations

71 N.E. 1137 (N.Y. 1904)
71 N.E. 1137