From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nevada Title Company v. Rascals

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 12, 2007
2:07-CV-0650-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2007)

Opinion

2:07-CV-0650-RLH-PAL.

December 12, 2007


ORDER


Before this Court is the Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#11, filed November 14, 2007), entered by the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Interplead Funds (#7) and Request for Decision on Motion to Interplead Funds (#10). No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge Leen's Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and the matter was submitted for consideration.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leen is not contrary to law and should be affirmed, accepted and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leens's Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation (#11, entered November 14, 2007) is AFFIRMED, ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Interplead Funds (#7) and Request for Decision (#10) are granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall deposit the surplus funds totaling $74,826.83, less 812.50 in attorney fees and $697 in costs, with the Registry of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL POTENTIAL CLAIMS FOR LIABILITY AGAINST Plaintiff NTC be dismissed and NTC discharged from this matter.


Summaries of

Nevada Title Company v. Rascals

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 12, 2007
2:07-CV-0650-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Nevada Title Company v. Rascals

Case Details

Full title:NEVADA TITLE COMPANY, Plaintiff(s), v. LIL RASCALS, et al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 12, 2007

Citations

2:07-CV-0650-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2007)

Citing Cases

Protective Life Ins. Co. v. de Leon

“The proper rule, in an action in the nature of interpleader, is that the plaintiff should be awarded…