Neusom v. Gist

Full title: SHERMAN NEUSOM v. VINA GIST, et al.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 5, 2015

CV-14-9621-R (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2015)

Opinion

SHERMAN NEUSOM v. VINA GIST, et al. No. CV-14-9621-R United States District Court, Central District of California January 5, 2015

          MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SUA SPONTE REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT

          HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL, JUDGE

         A district court must remand a case to state court "if at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction." 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Because this is an unlawful detainer action, a federal question does not present itself. See Indymac Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. Ocampo, No. CV 09-2337, 2010 WL 234828, *2 (CD. Cal. Jan. 13, 2010) (sua sponte remanding an action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiff's complaint contained only an unlawful detainer claim). As such, this case is now REMANDED TO STATE COURT.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.