From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neuro-Communication Servs., Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jan 24, 2022
165 Ohio St. 3d 1509 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

2021-0130

01-24-2022

NEURO-COMMUNICATION SERVS., INC. v. CINCINNATI INS. CO.


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, No. 4:20-CV-1275. On motion to admit newly discovered evidence of amicus curiae Queens Tower Restaurant, Inc., d.b.a. Primavista. Motion denied. Petitioners’ motion to strike Queens Tower Restaurant, Inc.’s improper supplemental brief and alternative motion to admit newly discovered evidence granted.

Brunner, J., would deny petitioners’ motion as moot.


Summaries of

Neuro-Communication Servs., Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jan 24, 2022
165 Ohio St. 3d 1509 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

Neuro-Communication Servs., Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEURO-COMMUNICATION SERVS., INC. v. CINCINNATI INS. CO.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Jan 24, 2022

Citations

165 Ohio St. 3d 1509 (Ohio 2022)
179 N.E.3d 1276