From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nestor v. Dependable Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 1989
552 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2201.

November 30, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lawrence R. Kirkwood, J.

Robert G. Hines, Naples, for appellants.

Roger A. Kelly and David G. Sheilds of Foster Kelly, Orlando, for appellees.


Appellants appeal an Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Proceedings Supplementary directing appellant's counsel to release $3,000.00 held in trust.

In 1982 appellants sold a 1979 Cadillac to Bruce Wood. The sale price was $3000.00 and Mr. Wood paid $1500.00 down. Appellants retained title to the automobile. The transaction eventually became the subject of litigation, and the trial court directed appellant to either return the money received from Wood or deliver title to the vehicle. Appellant gave $3000.00 to his attorney to tender to Mr. Wood who rejected the tender.

In May 1984 appellant executed a promissory note to Barnett Bank and gave Barnett a security interest in the same 1979 Cadillac Seville. When appellant defaulted, Dependable Insurance Co., (Dependable) Barnett's assignee, brought an action to recover on the note, and the trial court entered judgment against appellant. Dependable then sought to levy execution pursuant to Section 56.29, Florida Statutes on the $3000.00 held by appellant's attorney, and the trial court directed appellant's attorney to release the funds.

Jurisdictional prerequisites for supplementary post-judgment proceedings are a returned and unsatisfied writ of execution and an affidavit averring that the writ is valid and unsatisfied, along with a list of third persons to be impleaded. Wieczoreck v. H H Builders, Inc., 450 So.2d 867 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), affirmed, 475 So.2d 227 (Fla. 1985); § 56.29(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). Appellee concedes that the affidavit was not filed. Since the trial court did not have jurisdiction, it is not necessary to reach the remaining issues. We therefore reverse the appealed order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DANIEL, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Nestor v. Dependable Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 1989
552 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Nestor v. Dependable Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE D. NESTOR, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. DEPENDABLE INSURANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 1989

Citations

552 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Musella

On appeal, Mrs. Sullivan maintains that an affidavit under section 56.29(1) is a jurisdictional prerequisite…

Bleidt v. Lobato

Accordingly, we reject the appellants' claim that return of an unsatisfied writ of execution is a…