From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesby v. All Commercial Floors

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 6, 2022
4:22-cv-0167-P (N.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2022)

Opinion

4:22-cv-0167-P

04-06-2022

Benita D. Nesby, Plaintiff, v. All Commercial Floors, Defendant.


ORDER

MARK T. PITTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are Plaintiff Benita Nesby's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“Motion”) and United States Magistrate Judge Cureton's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. ECF Nos. 2, 6. The Court, having conducted a review for plain error and finding none, ACCEPTS Judge Cureton's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and DENIES the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.

As recommended in the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court informs Plaintiff that the complaint will be subject to dismissal without further notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) unless, within seven days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the clerk of Court the filing and administrative fees of $402.00.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nesby v. All Commercial Floors

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 6, 2022
4:22-cv-0167-P (N.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Nesby v. All Commercial Floors

Case Details

Full title:Benita D. Nesby, Plaintiff, v. All Commercial Floors, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

Citations

4:22-cv-0167-P (N.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2022)