Summary
holding Rosemond was not retroactive to second or successive habeas petition
Summary of this case from Ford v. United StatesOpinion
Case No. 1:14-cv-606-SLB-TMP
02-29-2016
GREGORY NESBITT, Petitioner, v. JOHN T. RATHMAN, Warden, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation on January 28, 2016, recommending dismissal of petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief. (Doc.13). No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. Having now carefully considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be ADOPTED and the recommendation ACCEPTED.
It is therefore ORDERED that the petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the above-styled cause be and hereby is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
DONE the 29th day of February, 2016.
/s/_________
SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE