From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nero v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 27, 2012
Case No. 3:11 CV 00919-TC (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11 CV 00919-TC

09-27-2012

JAY NERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on September 6, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202,1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

_________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nero v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 27, 2012
Case No. 3:11 CV 00919-TC (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Nero v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JAY NERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 27, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11 CV 00919-TC (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2012)