From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nemelka v. Salt Lake County

Supreme Court of Utah
Jul 11, 1972
499 P.2d 862 (Utah 1972)

Opinion

No. 12967.

July 11, 1972.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Stewart M. Hanson, J.

Carl J. Nemelka, Salt Lake County Atty., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Keith E. Taylor and James B. Lee of Parsons, Behle Latimer, Salt Lake City, for defendants-respondents.


Suit filed under the Declaratory Judgment Act by the Salt Lake County Attorney, to test the constitutionality of Title 11-17, Utah Code Annotated (1953), as amended, as the latter might apply to the facts of the instant case, where the trial court declared its application was apropos constitutionally. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

Title 78-33, Utah Code Annotated 1933.

Chap. 29, Laws of Utah 1967.

Kennecott petitioned the County Commission, pursuant to the act, to "authorize the issuance and selling of revenue bonds . . . to finance the cost of acquiring, constructing and equipping air and water control facilities" and leasing it to Kennecott "so as to achieve greater industrial development in the State of Utah," — slavishly paying respect to the act, succumbing to the pressure of federal and state bureaus dedicated to funded ecology, and paying homage to our recent case of Allen v. Tooele County.

In the Allen case, the act was upheld in its application to a petition and contract envisioned and consummated by Tooele County and a private enterprise, formed to extract electrolytically certain minerals from our beloved, — The Great Salt Lake. The guidelines for the granting of such application, including nonliability of or taxability by the county, clearly are set out in that case, and explored with some degree of apprehension in the dissent, but we believe and hold that it is dispositive here, where industrial growth is conduced to as well or more by oxygen in the air as magnesium in solution. The act appears to be broad enough to cover the expansion of existing facilities for the purpose of industrial development as it does to initiate or create such facilities in the first instance, and we so hold.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nemelka v. Salt Lake County

Supreme Court of Utah
Jul 11, 1972
499 P.2d 862 (Utah 1972)
Case details for

Nemelka v. Salt Lake County

Case Details

Full title:Carl J. NEMELKA, as County Attorney of Salt Lake County, Plaintiff and…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Jul 11, 1972

Citations

499 P.2d 862 (Utah 1972)
28 Utah 2

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Brennan v. Bowman

Fickes v. Missoula County, 470 P.2d 287 (Mont. 1970); Nemelka v. Salt Lake County, 499 P.2d 862 (Utah 1972);…

Kennecott Copper Corporation v. Town of Hurley

"8. The fact that Plaintiff has commenced construction of the 'project' proposed to be financed, does not…