From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Sparks

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Feb 12, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-cv-01316 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-cv-01316.

February 12, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Before the Court is Petitioner David Nelson's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees [Docket 1] and Complaint [Docket 2]. By Standing Order entered August 1, 2006, and filed in this case on December 9, 2009, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation (PF R). Magistrate Judge Stanley filed her PF R [Docket 5] on January 12, 2010, recommending that this Court dismiss this case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and deny Plaintiff's Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs.

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). In addition, this Court need not conduct a de novo review when a party "makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Objections to the PF R in this case were due on February 1, 2010. To date, no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF R [Docket 5], DENIES the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees [Docket 1], DISMISSES the Complaint [Docket 2], and DISMISSES this case from the docket. A separate Judgment Order will enter this day implementing the rulings contained herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Sparks

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division
Feb 12, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-cv-01316 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Nelson v. Sparks

Case Details

Full title:DAVID NELSON, Plaintiff, v. PROSECUTOR C. MICHAEL SPARKS, and MINGO COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division

Date published: Feb 12, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-cv-01316 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 2010)

Citing Cases

Molineaux v. Vickers

The presiding District Judge previously dismissed an analogous civil action seeking an injunction requiring…