From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

December, 1927


Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that plaintiff presented a prima facie case. The dismissal was not upon the merits. A dismissal in an equity case, without findings of fact and conclusions of law, must be regarded as a nonsuit. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 441; Stephenson v. Southerland, 150 App. Div. 275; Ross v. Caywood, 162 N.Y. 259; Ware v. Dos Passos, Id. 281; McNulty Brothers v. Offerman, 141 App. Div. 730.) If it be the intent to dismiss upon the merits, a decision must be made pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. This rule is not changed by section 482 of the act. Young, Rich, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Nelson v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. NELSON, Appellant, v. THOMAS J. RYAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1927

Citations

222 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Schildkraut v. Paino

There is no decision; therefore, the judgment herein in its present form may not be sustained. (Civ. Prac.…

Querze v. Querze

Attention has been called to the fact that there was no trial of the merits in either of those actions. There…