From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Portland Police Bureau

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 2, 2022
3:22-cv-262-JR (D. Or. May. 2, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-262-JR

05-02-2022

GEORGE PATTON NELSON, III, Plaintiff, v. PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Jolie A. Russo United States Magistrate Judge

On February 17, 2022, plaintiff initiated this action alleging:

I am in fear for my life. Unreasonable Positive law (PPB) Police is always in my private domain. Lee Griffith (Jew Mob) 1456815 (1) Account # for $15,000 to kill me.
Complaint (ECF 2) at pp. 4. Plaintiff seeks:
-Temporary injunctive relief from unreasonable positive law's invading my private domain. Effectively turning my apartment into a private prison. They won't even allow for me to sleep.
Id.

On February 23, 2022, the Court granted in forma pauperis status but dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, within fourteen days, to cure deficiencies in the complaint. Order (ECF4). The Court warned plaintiff that failure to amend would result in dismissal of this action. Id. at p. 4. To date, plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint as directed. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to follow a Court Order.

CONCLUSION

This action should be dismissed without prejudice. A judgment should enter accordingly.

This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the district court's judgment or appealable order. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the court. Thereafter, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to timely file objections to any factual determination of the Magistrate Judge will be considered as a waiver of a party's right to de novo consideration of the factual issues and will constitute a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to this recommendation.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Portland Police Bureau

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 2, 2022
3:22-cv-262-JR (D. Or. May. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Nelson v. Portland Police Bureau

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE PATTON NELSON, III, Plaintiff, v. PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: May 2, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-262-JR (D. Or. May. 2, 2022)