From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sep 4, 2012
382 S.W.3d 192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98019.

2012-09-4

Fredrick NELSON, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Kenneth Paul Carp, Clayton, MO, for respondent Nordstrom, Inc.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Kenneth Paul Carp, Clayton, MO, for respondent Nordstrom, Inc.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent Division of Employment Security.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Fredrick Nelson (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant's appeal. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sep 4, 2012
382 S.W.3d 192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Nelson v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Fredrick NELSON, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and Division of Employment…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Sep 4, 2012

Citations

382 S.W.3d 192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)