From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Lois Deberry Special Needs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
NO. 3-12-0814 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-12-0814

12-20-2012

OSWALD URBAN NELSON v. LOIS DEBERRY SPECIAL NEEDS, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 38) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 41).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Powell (Docket No. 27) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot.

Any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Therefore, the Plaintiff is not certified to pursue an appeal in forma pauperis. Id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nelson v. Lois Deberry Special Needs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
NO. 3-12-0814 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Nelson v. Lois Deberry Special Needs

Case Details

Full title:OSWALD URBAN NELSON v. LOIS DEBERRY SPECIAL NEEDS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-12-0814 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2012)