From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Liberty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jan 9, 2017
No. 1:16-cv-00261-GZS (D. Me. Jan. 9, 2017)

Opinion

No. 1:16-cv-00261-GZS

01-09-2017

ROBERT LEE NELSON, Petitioner v. RANDALL LIBERTY, Respondent


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December 9, 2016, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 13). Petitioner filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16) on January 4, 2017.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. It is hereby ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases.

3. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.
4. It is hereby ORDERED that a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases is DENIED because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).

/s/ George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge Dated this 9th day of January, 2017.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Liberty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Jan 9, 2017
No. 1:16-cv-00261-GZS (D. Me. Jan. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Nelson v. Liberty

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE NELSON, Petitioner v. RANDALL LIBERTY, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Jan 9, 2017

Citations

No. 1:16-cv-00261-GZS (D. Me. Jan. 9, 2017)