From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 8, 2015
Case No. 2:12-cv-1167 (S.D. Ohio May. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-1167

05-08-2015

Joshua Copenhaver Nelson, Plaintiff, v. Wanza Jackson, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge King

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge's October 29, 2014 Report and Recommendation. The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny plaintiff's post-judgment motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b) to amend the judgment and for relief from judgment. The magistrate judge recommended that the court find that it lacks jurisdiction over the issues presented by the motion because plaintiff's simultaneously-filed notice of appeal divested this court of jurisdiction. See Pickens v. Howes, 549 F.3d 377, 383 (6th Cir. 2008). Though plaintiff has objected to the report and recommendation, he expressly acknowledges that the court lacks jurisdiction. The court therefore denies plaintiff's objection (doc. 107) and adopts the Report and Recommendation (doc. 05).

s/ James L. Graham

JAMES L. GRAHAM

United States District Judge
DATE: May 8, 2015


Summaries of

Nelson v. Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 8, 2015
Case No. 2:12-cv-1167 (S.D. Ohio May. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Nelson v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:Joshua Copenhaver Nelson, Plaintiff, v. Wanza Jackson, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 8, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-1167 (S.D. Ohio May. 8, 2015)