From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Dep't of Revenue

OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax
Jul 3, 2018
TC-MD 180088R (Or. T.C. Jul. 3, 2018)

Opinion

TC-MD 180088R

07-03-2018

CLINTON NELSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL

This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court's Decision of Dismissal, entered June 13, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule-Magistrate Division (TCR-MD) 16 C(1).

This matter came before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Motion) on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to appeal within the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2).

The court's references to the Oregon Revised Statutes are to 2017.

A review of Plaintiff's materials shows the Written Objection Determination related to Defendant's Proposed Refund Adjustment and Offset was mailed to Plaintiff on November 16, 2017. The Complaint was filed on March 14, 2018. This interval is longer than the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2), which provides:

Plaintiff's Complaint was postmarked on this date. ORS 305.418(1). --------

"An appeal under ORS 323.416 or 323.623 or from any notice of assessment or refund denial issued by the Department of Revenue with respect to a tax imposed under ORS chapter 118, 308, 308A, 310, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 or this chapter, or collected pursuant to ORS 305.620, shall be filed within 90 days after the date of the notice. An appeal from a proposed adjustment under ORS 305.270 shall be filed within 90 days after the date the notice of adjustment is final."

Plaintiff's response to the Motion appears to show that he had provided documents Defendant has previously requested. However, the issue before the court is whether Plaintiff timely appealed Defendant's refund adjustment and the subsequent objection determination. Plaintiff did not provide documents relevant to that inquiry. The court is not aware of any circumstances that extend the statutory limit of 90 days. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is allowed. Plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Dated this ___ day of July 2018.

/s/_________

RICHARD DAVIS

MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal , file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court , by mailing to: 1163 State Street , Salem , OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor , 1241 State Street , Salem , OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was signed by Magistrate Davis and entered on July 3 , 2018.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Dep't of Revenue

OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax
Jul 3, 2018
TC-MD 180088R (Or. T.C. Jul. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Nelson v. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON NELSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon…

Court:OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax

Date published: Jul 3, 2018

Citations

TC-MD 180088R (Or. T.C. Jul. 3, 2018)