From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neils v. Putnam Hospital Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2000
276 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued September 15, 2000.

October 16, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Robert Roffman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), entered May 24, 1999, as, upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages awarding the plaintiff Joseph J. Neils damages in the sum of $25,000 for past pain and suffering and $315,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff Joseph J. Neils and against him.

Meiselman, Farber, Packman Eberz, P.C., Mount Kisco, N.Y. (Myra I. Packman of counsel), for appellant.

Jacoby Meyers, LLP (Finkelstein, Levine, Gittelsohn Partners, LLP, Newburgh, N.Y. [Terry D. Horner] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff Joseph J. Neils damages for future pain and suffering, and granting a new trial with respect thereto; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the appellant, unless within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, the plaintiff Joseph J. Neils shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to damages for future pain and suffering from the sum of $315,000 to the sum of $200,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly; in the event that the plaintiff Joseph J. Neils so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The award of damages for future pain and suffering for an injury to the nondominant hand of the plaintiff Joseph J. Neils, leaving him with intermittent pain, slight loss of sensation, and some diminished range of motion, deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein (see, CPLR 5501[c]).


Summaries of

Neils v. Putnam Hospital Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 2000
276 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Neils v. Putnam Hospital Center

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH J. NEILS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. PUTNAM HOSPITAL CENTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 67

Citing Cases

Nutley v. N.Y. City Trans

Despite the surgery, the plaintiff continued to experience pain, numbness, tingling, loss of strength, and…

Nardella v. Gerut

Bonanno v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 14 AD3d 377 (1st Dept. 2005); Navarez v. New York City…